Project Team Health: a Casualty of Business-as-Usual

Nov 02 2010

While trying to address the perennial SCRUM-versus-waterfall question by researching project success rates, I came upon an interesting article in Dr. Dobb's Journal.  After surveying over 300 project management practitioners with expertise in both Agile and traditional methodologies, the Journal was able to quantify success for 71% of Agile projects and 61% “traditional” projects.  Whether this implies that self-organization effectively mitigates at least some risks, or that Agile projects are more disciplined than is commonly perceived, remains open to interpretation [more on this in my next blog entry], but even more interesting were the trends about workplace health, as documented almost as an afterthought on the survey’s periphery[1].

It seems that 80% of IT managers and 70% of project managers put the needs of their staff over the need to deliver on time and on budget.  Great…, no?  Well, to me at least, this is actually somewhat worrisome.  However, only 53% of surveyed business stakeholders have expressed a similar sentiment.  Wow!

Effective teams enable organizations to achieve the high levels of performance that are essential to competing effectively in a challenging business environment[2].  Prioritizing project health over team health is detrimental to morale and undermines the team’s strong long-term commitment to the mission of the organization.  Does this underscore the belief that IT services are becoming [or have already become!] a commodity?

Typically, project teams' and project managers’ performance assessments, rewards, and recognition are based on how higher level managers perceive the teams are meeting the traditional cost, schedule, and performance goals. The pressure to execute day-to-day without misstep is only continuing to balloon steadily, but irrespective of the SCRUM-versus-waterfall debate, teams are still evaluated in large part on the perception of their final output.  Until this disconnect between project success and project team success is bridged, allowing the above numbers to get closer to 100%, I think we have a problem.

 

About the Author

Kristofer Pierscieniak's picture

Mr. Pierscieniak has 15 years professional experience in Technology Consulting: as technical program manager specializing in delivery of integrated enterprise-scale solution and business process optimization expert for Fortune100 companies. Focusing on aligning tactical execution with long-term corporate vision, he leverages his background in software architectures and systems engineering to translate strategic organizational objectives into turn-key business solutions. Mr. Pierscieniak has a BSCE degree from the University of California - San Diego, PMP, CSM, Six Sigma Green Belt, Software Development Frameworks certification, and Microsoft PSP/TSP (Team Software Process) expertise. He is an active member of PMI, ASQ, Agile Alliance, Richmond’s chapter of BringIT, and the online Consultants Network.

 

Disclaimer

The words and opinions expressed here are those of each article's respective author, and do not necessarily represent the views of CapTech Ventures.