This write up contains a high level investigation of the Business Intelligence solution offering from Microsoft (SQL Server Reporting Services or SSRS) and the offering from SAP, the Business Objects base reporting package (BOBJ).  While BOBJ does have more options for reporting and presentation, from a basic report feature standpoint both of the tools offer similar functionality and offer the user a great deal of flexibility in the presentation of their data.  The other difference between the two solutions that needs to be considered is the expense associated with the Total Cost of Ownership.  While you will have similar costs in the requirements gathering, design, development, testing, and ongoing administration, there is a significant difference in the licensing cost of these products.  While BOBJ charges by either named user or CPU, SSRS comes with SQL Server so there are no additional costs with adding a BI tool set.

SQL Server and Sharepoint offer a quality BI solution, which meets basic architectural principles and business requirements.  Because of Microsoft’s desire to establish itself in the BI space, it offers the BI components with a license to SQL Server.  The lack of flashy, AJAX style reporting features (which are often shown in demos of BOBJ) may limit the business’s interest in SQL Server.  Additionally, BOBJ’s reporting, ad hoc queries, dashboard, data visualization capabilities are key strengths of the SAP BOBJ product suite and are among top rated BI tools.

When considering the total cost of ownership, a company must consider the individual components that make up this expense.  Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) comes from the High Level Business Requirements, Software Selection Process, Software Installation, Detailed Requirements, Design, Development, System and User Acceptance Testing, Production Software Licenses, the ongoing Maintenance of the solution.   While many of these costs would be similar across the two platforms, a company needs to assess the differences in development time, and ongoing maintenance and understand which tool their personnel and IT infrastructure can support.  Specific costs and return on investments are highly dependent on company’s specific situations and deployment choices.  From our specific client exposure, mid-market companies do not opt for BOBJ, and we find that SQL Server is more prevalent.  An SSRS solution will often be lower cost from a licensing perspective as all components are included with a SQL Server license.  However, SSRS requires a developer to build their reports, where BOBJ supports an end business user self-service model.  So long term technical support and development costs could actually be lower with BOBJ.

Because many companies already own SQL Server licenses within their infrastructure, the ease and low cost benefits of implementation may be too good to pass up.  However, companies either without SQL Server in house or requiring heavily visual reports accessible to business users or self-service access to information with minimal IT support may want to implement BOBJ as their BI stack.

Chris O'Keefe and I were assigned to investigate enterprise mashups, and we both immediately had the same flashback to our days in Northern Virginia, which was the first time we had heard the word mashup used. The popular local radio station, DC101, would air them on Sunday evenings, where they would combine two good songs, to make something that sounded just awful. As a result, our initial thoughts on the concept of mashups were not all that positive, that is until we realized they are one of the emerging trends of Web 2.0.

I’m a IBM Certified Cognos developer who is just learning Business Objects.  With many years of Cognos experience and just a few weeks with BO  I must be clearly biased towards Cognos and I probably am.  So with my bias why even write something comparing the two technologies?  Why not?  As a consultant I am always learning new technologies and being asked to compare and contrast them. Given the number of different tools offered by both vendors, I think the comparison is best done at the individual tool level.  It is also important to note that I have not used all the tools Business Objects has to offer.

Web Intelligence vs. Report Studio/Query Studio

Here are three things to remember when putting together a BI business case: